How it works
Advice that starts from what programmes actually require.
Since 2020 we've worked on 667+ applications. Everything below exists for one thing: making the advice you get honest.
Step 1
A realistic read on each programme
Each programme you're considering gets a Safe, Target or Reach read, based on its published requirements and admission data (minimum CGPA, tests, English scores, funding competition) and on what we've seen across 667+ engagements since 2020.
What it means for you
You can see which programmes are realistic before you pay a single application fee.
Step 2
What actually moves a decision
We look at your whole file, not just the numbers: research, projects, work experience and how well your goals match what a programme teaches.
What it means for you
Your time goes into the changes that help, like a stronger statement or a better-matched programme, not into things that won't move the decision.
Step 3
Programme matching
Your profile is matched against programmes that are open now, with deadlines, funding and requirements. Try it yourself on the Find programmes page.
Find programmes that fit you →What it means for you
You find good-fit programmes you'd never have browsed to, and you avoid famous names that don't suit you.
Step 4
Document support, reviewed by a person
Feedback on statements draws on hundreds of statements written with past applicants. Every comment and every shortlist is reviewed by a person before it reaches you.
What it means for you
Faster, more consistent feedback, with judgement where it matters.
What it won't do
An estimate isn't a promise. Committees make human decisions, and published requirements are a minimum, not a promise.
- It won't guarantee admission. Nobody honestly can.
- It won't write your statement. Your voice is part of what's being judged.
- It won't replace judgement. Every shortlist and document is reviewed by a person.
See your own odds
Send your profile for a free evaluation. You'll get a first read on where you stand and which programmes are realistic.